The current implementation fails as amend_coverage_from_src modifies the results afterwards

Due to this, I think it would be better for this implementation to live inside that function entirely. After all, this is exactly ‘amending coverage from looking at the source code’.

Codecov Report

Merging #218 into master will decrease coverage by 0.51%.
The diff coverage is 93.93%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #218      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.36%   90.85%   -0.52%     
==========================================
  Files           6        6              
  Lines         336      361      +25     
==========================================
+ Hits          307      328      +21     
- Misses         29       33       +4

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3ecba42...4599a20. Read the comment docs.

Resolved conflicts and moved the line-by-line functionality to amend_coverage_from_src. The only question left is whether we should apply config files also to sub folders, at the moment it does not.

So I have all the test working now locally, but both Travis and AppVeyor keep failing. If anyone has any pointers, that would be much appreciated.

@zundertj Why did you delete the file test/data/Coverage.jl.cov? Don’t you need to have that file inside the test/data/no_exclusions directory?

@zundertj On an unrelated note, could you edit the original post to have the following content exactly? That way, when this PR is merged, GitHub will automatically close the mentioned issues and pull requests. (But you have to use those specific words like Fixes and Closes in order for GitHub to understand you.)

Fixes #44
Fixes #53
Closes #55

Now that the core functionality has been factored out to CoverageTools.jl, this PR will need to be made to the https://github.com/JuliaCI/CoverageTools.jl repository.